The Ned rig, a new bait added to my bass fishing arsenal

As long as I can remember, I’ve loved to fish. My entire adult life, I’ve owned a boat and made fishing trips. In 1981, I joined a bass club, and for the next 24 years, spent a considerable amount of my fishing time in bass tournaments. I was pretty competitive, at one point winning 5 straight club championships, winning Anglers of the Year with my wife Rose in a couples circuit, placing second for Anglers of the Year in a team circuit one year, winning a couple of smaller open tournaments, and taking second place in a large open tournament that awarded a new boat for first place. But bass tournament fishing is tough. You go on the assigned day, to a lake not of your choice, no matter how bad the weather or how you feel. You’re only fishing for 3 (club tournaments) or 5 (bigger or team tournaments) bass, so catching a lot of fish doesn’t matter at all, it has to be a small number of bigger black bass, in order to place well in the tournament. Fishing for big fish will make you tend to fish bigger baits, and use the heftier tackle required for them. That eventually became just too tough on my joints, cratered as they were, from all those years of heavy machine shop work. I was also feeling some burnout from all the tournament fishing, and in 2005, I gave it up, in favor of non competitive crappie fishing.

My personal best bass, 11 lbs, 9 oz., caught at Lake Fork, in a Bass Club of Fort Worth tournament, way back in my cigar smoking years, in March of 1995.

Crappie fishing has many of the same attractions as bass fishing, the strategy of figuring out where and how to catch them, finding them, and getting them to bite. And crappie are more plentiful than bass, so you can catch more of them than bass on most days, and unlike black bass, you won’t adversely affect their populations by keeping a few to eat (and they are very good eating). And crappie are small enough that light tackle is all that’s required to pursue them. It’s even easier to make your own lures, which I’ve always loved to do. And if you aren’t tournament fishing, you can pick your days, only going out when the weather isn’t too bad, and the lake isn’t too crowded. That became more of a thing when I cut my work hours in 2016, then retired in 2021. I do love crappie fishing.

My personal best crappie, 2.61 pounds, caught at Cedar Creek Lake, April 5th, 2022.

But over time, I started gravitating toward mixing in some bass fishing again, too. Rods got lighter, small spinning reels got better, small braided line improved to the point of becoming the norm for so many anglers like me, and I realized that if I just stuck to finesse fishing with light tackle for bass, I could mix that in with my crappie fishing, and have a lot of fun with it, without taxing my cratered old fart body too much. But after 15 years away from tournaments, and not keeping up with innovations and improvements in finesse baits, I knew I needed to learn and update my finesse baits. You don’t research finesse bass fishing much these days before stumbling across the Ned rig. The incredible numbers of fish caught by expert practitioners of midwest finesse fishing (the preferred name for Ned rig fishing) has caused the Ned rig to become one of the most revered finesse fishing baits ever, with so many videos and written articles to be found on it, and so many variations of baits for it. I tried it briefly, but with its exposed hook, it wasn’t really suitable for the water I was fishing (too much to snag it on), and I soon moved on, settling on the tiny child rig as my preferred bait for fishing the boat docks, brush, and other cover I was fishing. I especially loved the tiny child rig for bed fishing, and the last couple of springs, have started making trips to Lake Fork to bed fish for bass in March, April, and May.

A 7.70 pound bass caught from Lake Fork on March 13th, 2024, on a tiny child rig.

But most of my fishing time is spent on Cedar Creek Lake. I live a half mile from it and have enjoyed fishing it for many years, so it’s a natural for my normal preferred lake. I fish from one end of it to the other, but tend to spend more time on the mid lake. It’s closer to home, doesn’t get as crowded as the lower lake, and I’ve developed a pretty good collection of fishing spots (a milk run, we bass anglers like to call it) on that part of the lake. But with the lake over three and a half feet low, and much of my favorite bass cover on the bank, I recently came to the realization that I needed a good finesse bait for the more open water of the sea walls and rocky points where I was finding very finicky bass. I decided it was time to revisit the Ned rig, and research it better this time.

A Ned rig consists of a small plastic bait, rigged on a small jig (usually a mushroom head jig) with an exposed hook. Researching and learning about the Ned rig has been fascinating for me. As I mentioned, it’s one of the most revered finesse fishing baits on the planet, but there is so much bad info put out about it, even from good anglers and even pros. They would have you using a heavier jig and a bigger, heavier hook, and sometimes even a weedless hook. When you do all that, it’s no longer a Ned rig. It’s just another variation of a shaky head jig. Now granted, shaky head jigs are also good baits, but they won’t draw nearly as many bites as a Ned rig, and work better with heavier tackle than the light finesse tackle an arthritic old fart like me wants to spend a lot of time using. I couldn’t believe how often I would start watching a video or reading a written article by a Ned rig “expert”, only to find out he’s fishing a 1/4 or 3/8 oz jig 20 or 30 feet deep. That’s not a Ned rig.

I finally figured out that I needed to find written articles and videos by the bait’s namesake (Ned Kehde) to gain really valid info about it. A true Ned rig uses a small plastic bait (2 1/2″ or so is a very popular size), a really lightweight jig (usually a 1/32 or 1/16 oz) with a very small thin wire hook (usually no bigger than a size 2) on a medium light or light spinning rod and a small reel. Plastic baits made of Elaztech, rather than the usual plastisol, really work well for this rig because, (1) they are more buoyant than most other plastics, and (2) they are so stretchy and collapse so easily and completely that they interfere with hooking the fish less than any other plastic. That’s important when you’re using the preferred small thin wire hook. The less the bait interferes with the hook, the better. I’m using a Finesse TRD bait. It’s made of the preferred buoyant Elaztech. But it’s infused with salt, which lessens the buoyancy. So I’m doing what Ned Kehde does; I’m soaking the baits in warm water and stretching them out several times, to get rid of that salt and improve the buoyancy. Just fishing them will eventually do that, but the warm water and stretching takes care of it quickly.

The Ned rig I fished last Tuesday. It’s a Finesse TRD on a homemade 1/16th oz jig made with a Do-It Midwest Finesse Jig mold. I’ve since switched to a jig made with a Do-It Nose Worm Jig mold that matches the profile of the TRD better (I’d ordered that Nose Worm Jig mold before the Tuesday trip, but didn’t receive it until Wednesday).

There are a number of retrieves the experts use, but what I realized after some better research is that one of the best ways to fish it is a simple very slow swimming slack line retrieve, which is exactly like the retrieve I so often use when swimming my crappie jigs. Armed with that knowledge, and already comfortable with using that retrieve, I was suddenly confident enough to try the bait for an extended time on my more open water spots, and had immediate success with it. And with an even lighter rod than I’m using for the tiny child rig. It is plainly going to be a mainstay in my bass fishing, going forward. The retrieve I’m using is a bit hard to explain, if you’ve never used it. You reel very, very slowly. If you’re casting to visible shoreline rocks or other cover, you start your retrieve as soon as the bait lands. If not, you count it down as it sinks, then start your retrieve just before it reaches the bottom. Part of the learning curve is figuring out the rate the bait sinks at. You retrieve the bait slowly enough that you always have slack in your line (a belly in the line, we always called it). If your line is tight, you are either reeling too fast, or your jig is too heavy. But you want to keep the bait mostly off the bottom. Ticking stuff just off the bottom as you retrieve is fine, and can even trigger bites sometimes, but don’t just drag the bait on the bottom. Not only would it snag more, but the action isn’t as good either. And this is where the buoyancy of the Elaztech helps a lot. You can reel it more slowly without it sinking to the bottom. And the action of the bait isn’t as good on a tight line, so keeping a slack line is important, too. It takes some practice to perfect that retrieve, but these baits are so good, you’re still going to catch some fish while you’re working on it.

Knowing you’re going to catch some big bass occasionally, mixed in with lots of small ones, the temptation is to keep changing to a bigger, stronger hook. Don’t do it. That small, light, shorter hook is a very important part of the success of the bait. I’m cheating ever so slightly on hook size, using a size 1 thin wire hook, but I recommend against going larger than that. I’m still experimenting with a size 2 as well. I might use the size 1 on an aggressive bite, and the size 2 on the toughest of days. We’ll see where I end up. When you shop for Ned rig tackle, you’ll find lots of bigger, heavier jigs with bigger, heavier hooks. That’s because so many anglers ask for them. Tackle manufacturers are going to make whatever sells. Resist the temptation to buy the bigger jigs and bigger hooks. The smaller ones with the smaller hooks are the ones that will catch you so many fish. I can’t tell you how many forum posts I ran across where the angler had ignored Ned rig recommendations and moved to a bigger jig and hook, then posted about how he was moving on to other baits because he was no longer doing as well with the Ned rig as he was with the other baits. Well duh, I wonder why. And this is an excellent bait for frugal anglers. The Elaztech baits may seem a bit pricey, but you’ll soon learn that they far outlast any other kind of plastic, and you can catch fish after fish on each one. And the small jigs don’t need to be really expensive ones. I make my own. If you end up fishing rocks as much as I do, pay close attention to your hook point, and keep it sharp. Even though you’re mostly staying off the bottom, you’re still going to tick enough rocks (and hang up on them) to keep dulling that point.

I’m using 15 pound test braided line, with a 12 pound test fluorocarbon leader. That gives you the best of both worlds. The Seaguar Blue Label fluorocarbon leader is really invisible in the water, but very abrasion resistant. And the braid is so sensitive, it lets you feel every bite, even on a slack line. Even frugal Ned Kehde, who’s still using some 1970’s vintage reels, has made the switch to braided line with a fluorocarbon leader. It’s just too good a setup not to. There have been volumes and volumes written about this bait. I’m only a beginner with it, but what I have written will give you a better start with it than so many of those articles and videos that steer you away from a Ned rig and have you fishing a shaky head jig instead. My first day of seriously fishing it most of the day was last Tuesday. I caught 17 bass, 4 hybrid stripers, 2 drum, 2 crappie, 1 catfish, 1 buffalofish, and 1 white bass. Two of the bass were 4 pounders, and five of the non-bass fish were bigger than that. All the fish were caught in 3 to 8 feet of water. We’d had several days of warmer weather, and this time of year, that will improve the bite enough that I thought I could catch fish with my new bait. I went fishing again Thursday. It was very different conditions, 35 degrees that morning right behind a cold front. I knew fishing would be tougher, and so a good test for my new found bait. Sure enough, it was a tougher bite, especially in the morning, but I still caught 11 bass, with two more of them 4 pounders, and 8 other fish. And here I am, only just starting out with the bait. I look forward to a lot more fun days on the water with a Ned rig.

A four pounder caught on a Ned rig at Cedar Creek last Tuesday.

Summer Rides

I never quite got around to updating my blog with my summer rides, until now. I think my negligence in this area reflects the changes I’ve made in my riding style. I still track my mileage on the bike, but I no longer have mileage goals at all. And without mileage goals, I just don’t check and update my riding log as often, and so fall behind on my blog too. On my good riding weeks, I do three bike rides totaling around 100 miles, but I let a lot more things reduce that mileage than I used to, concessions to age, I guess.

For example, where I used to just ride through illnesses, and put in extra makeup mileage after injuries, or anything else that forced me off the bike for a while, I don’t do either of those these days. I do rest and recovery when I think that will help, and I don’t worry about making up lost miles. I also allow other activity to substitute for bike rides. That’s mostly fossil hunting this year. I’ve found that my typical fossil hunt, consisting of a long hike down a creek or river bed and climbing in and out of it, to be its own aerobic exercise, often comparable to what I would put in on a bike ride. So when I take a fossil hunting day, I let that substitute for one of my rides that week. That explains why my September mileage is low this year. I had some fun fossil hunting trips that month. I should probably post about them on this blog too.

Summer mileage:
July – 458 miles
August – 408 miles
September – 291 miles

My total mileage for the year as of the end of September is 3,268 miles. That’s 800 miles more than up to the same point last year, so I’m calling it a good year so far. I’ll end up with nowhere near the kind of mileage I used to ride in my most serious cycling years, but still a good year for where I am now, a 73 year old man who’s certainly had his share of health problems, but is still more fit than most my age. At this point, I’ll take it.

My route on August 26th.

2024 First Half Cycling Miles

I’ve been guilty of ignoring my blog again. My fossil hunting fell by the wayside a bit this year. I made a couple of early year trips, but didn’t find anything worth posting, and my surgically repaired left knee gave me so much pain after hiking to hunt, that I didn’t make more trips. I’m thinking my knee is finally enough better to allow for some creek/river hiking, but the bursitis in my right elbow is so bad now that it isn’t going to happen anytime soon. Old age is hell. I did make a guided fossil hunting trip while in Florida in May that yielded lots of shark teeth, but I never took individual photos of them and tried to explicitly identify all of them for a report here. I just treated some of the best ones for display, and added them to my coffee table display.

My bicycle riding this year, as in other recent years, has just been short local solo rides. My route lately has been ever evolving due to all the construction on area roads. I missed quite a bit of riding in January with a nasty cold, and the week in May when I was in Florida, but the rest of the year, I’ve been pretty diligent about getting my rides in, and have ridden 100 miles or more a week, quite a few times. My monthly riding mileages are as follows:

January – 105 miles
February – 385 miles
March – 454 miles
April – 428 miles
May – 256 miles
June – 411 miles

That gives me 2,110 miles ridden in the first half of 2024. That puts me on a pace to get more than 4,000 miles on the bike this year, which seems to be a worthy annual mileage goal for me these days. I’m still a lot slower on the bike than in my best years, and as exhausted after a 35 mile ride these days as I used to be after a 200k ride. I’ll say it again: Old age is hell.

My April 25th route.

3,780 miles on the bike in 2023

I ended up riding 455 miles in December. That gave me 3,780 total miles ridden in 2023. That’s much closer to the 4,000 miles I had hoped to ride than I thought I would achieve. It came about because of an upswing in mileage that started the last week of September. That week, I rode 105 miles. It was the first time since I cratered with COVID in October 2020 that I had managed to ride 105 miles in a single week. But, the rest of 2023, I rode 105 miles every week. It signals a really nice improvement in my health that I’m hoping will last for a while.

Here is December 8th’s route. It was my only outdoor ride in the month of December.

Fall Rides

COVID in October, 2020 was such a life changing event for me, I find myself comparing the before and after, especially when it comes to my performance on the bike, because it is there where the difference is so stark, even after most of the rest of the things I do started being mostly like the before. But there were definitely improvements in bike performance in September and October. First, in mid September, I decided to change my weekly three 30 mile rides to 35 mile rides. So, since that time, I’ve been getting in 105 miles a week on the bike, rather than the 90 miles I had been getting. I hadn’t gotten in that kind of mileage since before COVID. I seemed to be completely over the flu bout that hit me so hard in the summer, plus my surgically repaired knee finally seemed strong enough for more miles, so it seemed time to start doing it.

Before COVID, my average speed on the bike was around 15 mph. I would be faster on high effort days, and slower on days when it was windy, cold, etc, but my average was around 15 mph. But since COVID, I hadn’t averaged over 15 mph on an outdoor bike ride at all, not even once. That is, until October 20th. It was a nice day with fairly light winds, and on that day, I averaged 15.4 mph on the bike. I’ve had so many rides faster than that in previous years, but on this day, I had to do a little fist pump in my driveway when I got home. I know I’m never going to get completely back to the strength and fitness level I was at before, but at 72 years old now, I probably wouldn’t have been at that level still anyway. It’s all relative, and right now I’m feeling pretty good about where I am. I also made a slight increase in the amount of weight I’m lifting in my dumbbell work now too.

I ended up with 16 rides for 403 miles in September, and 17 rides for 490 miles in October. That October mileage is the best I’ve had in a month since that first COVID bout. It just turned much cooler, so all of this week’s rides have been indoors. Winters always seem to be more challenging for my lung health. We’ll see how I do this year.

October 20th’s route.

Summer bike rides

After only getting 120 miles on the bike in May because of my knee surgery at the beginning of the month, I had hoped to be getting my regular three rides a week all summer. It didn’t happen. I got the flu on July 11th, it quickly turned into pneumonia that caused two trips to the ER and a couple of days in the hospital, and left me with bronchitis so bad that I didn’t ride again until August 7th. So July ended up just like May had, with me only getting in 120 miles on the bike.

I haven’t been setting firm mileage goals these days, but I had hoped to manage 4,000 miles on the bike this year, just like I did last year. It’s not going to happen now. At the end of August, I only had 2,000 miles, so I’m likely to end up several hundred miles short of that 4,000. Nothing to do but ride when I can, and hope for a stretch of better health now.

Last week’s route.

Grayson County creek – August 29th

I took off yesterday morning and drove to a Grayson County creek, one of my previous hunted and favorite spots. It was my first fossil hunting trip since early in the year. I haven’t made any fossil posts here since October of last year, and had made only a couple of trips where I didn’t find much since then. The multiple meniscus tears in my left knee finally became too much to allow for hiking creeks, so I stopped hunting. I finally had meniscus repair knee surgery May 2nd, but have not been able to kneel on that knee again until very recently. The past few weeks, I have felt like that, with a bit of extra padding, I could use my knee pads again, but with daily temperatures from 105 to 110 degrees, I have just not been willing to fossil hunt. Finally, yesterday was cooler, so off I went.

Here are some in situ photos. That first photo has two teeth.




That last photo shows the biggest Ptychodus tooth I’ve ever found, sitting up pretty as a picture, on the gravel. I’ve always hiked a fair distance from creek access points, figuring my chances of success were better further away from popular easy to access spots. But in more recent trips to creeks in Grayson County, even my more remote spots show plenty of evidence of other fossil hunters. Yesterday was no exception, with digging evidence everywhere on the gravel bars, even the ones furthest away from access points. But that big Ptychodus tooth serves as a reminder that, even with very picked over conditions, you still have a chance of finding something you’ll really like. Here is what I brought home: 4 Ptychodus teeth, 1 gastropod, and 49 other teeth.

Here are two views of that biggest Ptychodus tooth.

Here are individual photos of some other teeth from the day.

Back on the bike after surgery

I had my left knee scoped on May 2nd, to repair multible meniscus tears. Exactly three weeks later, Tuesday of last week, I had regained enough range of motion in the knee that I returned to riding. I just did a 10 mile ride on the trainer that day, a 20 mile ride two days later, and a 30 mile ride the day after that. I’ve been riding an extremely flat virtual ride on the trainer, and thought that route would be easier on my knee than actual road riding, plus when doing a virtual route on the trainer, I have the ability to stop at any time, if I need to.

Those rides went well, so this Tuesday, I was back on the road, doing a 30 mile ride there. I did another 30 miles today, and plan on another 30 tomorrow. I hope to eventually tackle some longer and more hilly routes, but for now, I’ll just stick to the easy 30 mile route to Mabank that I’ve been riding for the last couple of years, while I’ve struggled with all these health issues.

Just before my surgery, I bought a new Garmin cycling GPS unit. Up until then, I had been still using an old Garmin Edge 705. The heartrate sensor strap quit working, and when I got online to buy another, I found out that Garmin had stopped making it. I’d already been thinking bout upgrading to a new GPS, so this seemed like the time. Before the Edge 705, I was using an Edge 305 that I bought in 2007. And the data from all my rides since 2009 is on the Garmin Connect website. And, since I’ve started doing Rouvy virtual rides on my trainer, data is shared between the Rouvy and Garmin Connect websites, so the data from both my virtual and road rides is on both websites. So even though Garmin cycling GPS units are pricier than I really need with the simple close to home solo riding I do these days, I really wanted another Garmin, and not another brand.

I knew that I really didn’t want or need the mapping or many of the other bells and whistles the new units have. But, in the 16 years I’ve been riding since I bought that Edge 305, I’ve really become used to having my heartrate and pedaling cadence on the display in front of me while I ride. So even though I was willing to settle for a simpler unit now, I still wanted one with the capability to display those. I ended up buying the least expensive new cycling GPS that Garmin makes, an Edge 130 Plus. I found it on sale on Amazon for $199, and that included the new style heart rate sensor. It works with the cadence sensor I already had installed on my bike, so I didn’t need to buy anything else.

It’s tiny, but has the brightest, clearest display I’ve ever seen on a cycling GPS. Here it is next to my old Cateye cycling computer.

The sun was behind me in that photo, so it does a good job of showing how good that display is, even in bright sunlight. Even though it’s much smaller than my old Edge 705, the display isn’t that much smaller.

And once again, compare that display to the old one. Of course, there are other differences from my old unit, too. With it, I used a USB cable connected to my PC and the Windows Garmin Express app to upload my ride date to the Garmin Connect site. Now, all I have to do is have the android Connect app running on my phone, and when I click the button on the 130 Plus to save the ride, the phone automatically uploads it to the Garmin connect site. Such a powerful GPS in such a tiny package, I really like it.

Off the bike for most of May because of my surgery, I only ended up with 120 miles ridden for the month. Here’s the data from Tuesday’s ride.

Fishing the Tiny Child Rig

Since I haven’t been fossil hunting lately, and my bike rides are the short little rides my knee is restricting me to, here’s a fishing update. I stopped fishing bass tournaments in 2006, and since that time have mainly been a crappie angler. But I’ve been doing more bass fishing the last couple of years, mostly just finesse fishing to suit my aging body. I posted a while back about the new finesse worms I was making and using. On a light shaky head jig, these have worked well late spring post spawn and throughout the summer. But I haven’t had that much success with them in the winter or at spawning time, so I set out to add a new finesse bait to my bass bait arsenal.

I had tried a Ned rig last year. It’s a rig that uses a Finesse TRD bait on a mushroom head jig. I caught some fish on it, but it hangs up so much that it’s really not very practical for Cedar Creek fishing. I read about a new way to fish this same bait, called a “tiny child rig”. This involves adding a tail weight to the bait, and using a Texas rig hook. There’s no better way to test a finesse bait than to watch it and bass’ reaction to it while sight fishing on beds. Lake Fork is a great sight fishing lake that’s not a bad drive from home, so I’ve been making some trips there to test this rig. The results have been pretty spectacular. I’ve never seen as good a bass finesse bait as this. To say I had success with it at Lake Fork is an understatement. I’m looking forward to trying it on Cedar Creek.

Yesterday’s trip to Lake Fork produced three five pounders.

Here are the tiny child rigs I’ve been using. The bait on top is a Zman Finesse TRD. It’s a 2.8 inch bait made of a unique material that’s very stretchy and spongy. The bottom bait is one I’ve started making from a Do-It four inch Senko mold. I’ve been using a tougher plastic than you’d use for an actual Senko, since I want it to hold a tail weight when I glue it in. The color shown has proven to be a good fish catcher, but a perch color I’ve started making has been better for the Fork bed fishing.

Here’s the tail weight I’ve been using. I make them myself with another Do-It mold. Like all the jigs I make, I use a bismuth/tin alloy, and not lead. Most tail weights are just slender weights you stab into the tail of a worm, but these mushroom head tail weights really put the weight at the very tail of the bait, and give a better action in the water. The baits really want to stand up, and with the hook on top while they’re standing, they really hook the fish well. I’ve been using a 1/16 oz weight in these small baits.

The tiny child rig is a unique bass bait unlike anything else I’ve seen. With the hook at the top end of the bait and the weight at the bottom, these are more weedless than any bait I’ve ever used. They also seem to hook bass better than any weedless bait I’ve ever used. And I seemed to be able to catch bedding bass at Fork better than anyone around me, even following others and casting to fish they couldn’t catch. As I said, I’m looking forward to trying the bait out on Cedar Creek.

2023 Bike Rides

I took off on the F5 yesterday morning and rode my 30 mile Mabank route. It was my first outdoor ride since early November last year. The weather this winter has been fairly mild, and there were days I could have ridden outdoors, but I wanted to make sure my vertigo issues were well enough under control before I tackled an outdoor ride again. But ever since I’ve been taking meclizine, my vertigo episodes have been infrequent, very mild, of very short duration, and never while I’m being active. I finally got to see a physical therapist for my vertigo. She did lots of testing, and thinks the source of my vertigo is my eyes. So I’m doing some eye exercises to see if that helps. If not, I’ll be seeing an ear nose and throat specialist for more testing.

So I think my only limitations right now are my left knee and my not-so-great fitness level, and I’m going to start doing mostly outdoor rides on the days the weather permits. As has been the case in recent years, I had my challenges getting my miles in this first quarter of 2023. Ongoing pain in my left knee has limited me, plus I had my usual January cold which turned into my usual January bronchitis, and I took a couple of weeks off the bike for that. I used to just ride through colds and bronchitis, but trying to do so these days seems to make getting well again take far too long.

I ended up with just 750 miles on the bike for the first quarter, much less than I would like and expect. My left knee surgery has been set for May 2nd, so I’m hoping for a better second half of this year on the bike. I’ve only made one fossil hunting hike this quarter, and didn’t find anything worthy of posting about. I’m hoping to be doing more of that as well after the surgery. The surgeon is just scoping my knee, so I’m hoping the recovery time won’t be too long. Yesterday’s Mabank route is more challenging than the very flat Cozumel virtual route I’ve been riding on the trainer, but it’s still a flat easy route. I don’t think I’m going to tackle anything longer or more challenging until after my knee gets fixed.

Yesterday’s 30 mile Mabank ride.