Navarro County creek – December 8th

I made another trip yesterday morning to the Navarro County creek I visited a couple of times in the last few weeks. I had found everything I brought home last time on gravel bars, but ran out of time, and never got to search some good looking gravel bars downstream. Those gravel bars are actually a shorter hike than the ones I found fossils on, so I’ve been wanting to come back. I ended up being very disappointed in those new gravel bars. I found nothing. I finally hiked on up the creek to the gravel bars where I’d found stuff last trip, and hunted them again.

The day didn’t produce a lot. Most teeth were just broken pieces. Here is what I brought home. Click the photos to be able to zoom in and get a closer look.

Here are a couple of in situ photos.

Here is the tooth in that first in situ photo, no roots left at all.

And the tooth from the second in situ photo, with just one root.

Here’s the largest tooth of the day. No roots, plus the tip broken off.

This bacculite looks a lot like those you find at NSR, except tumbled a lot more.

I so rarely find complete, or almost complete ammonites, so it seems ironic that in this creek, where all the teeth are broken into pieces, I find this guy.

And then there’s this. Here are three views. That’s a Tic Tac I used to prop it up in the first photo. The last photo is a view of the back side. It kind of looks like a piece of jaw bone with two teeth, one of them very tiny, on it. It may be Enchodus.

Fall Riding

December has arrived, so it’s time to start riding the trainer, rather than actual road miles. But I’m hoping to get in a couple of road rides later in the week, while the weather stays mild. All of my rides in September, October, and November were on the road, except for a single trainer ride on November 15th.

I had a good mileage month in September, with 12 rides for 390 miles. October wasn’t bad, either, with 10 rides for 300 miles. I made more fossil hunting trips in October. In November, I only ended up with 7 rides for 220 miles. Trips to the dentist, fossil hunting, Cancun, and buying a new truck all took their toll on my mileage.

But my health has been much better. My COPD seems to be well controlled by inhalers; I’m not wheezing at all now. I’m still over one mph slower on the bike than I was in 2020. Perhaps I can gain some of that back next year. I hope to tackle some longer rides as I get stronger, but probably nothing too long. I’m just doing rides of up to 40 miles right now.

Last Friday’s 40 mile route.

Cedar Creek Lake – November 19th

Like I’ve posted before, when I started this blog, it was mainly about my cycling, while being a lung cancer survivor. There are very few lung cancer survivors who are serious cyclists, so I thought my perspective would be unique. And I did all kinds of fun and exciting organized rides, so had cool things to post about. But after I moved to Gun Barrel City in 2013 and started just mostly doing solo rides on weekdays, my blog slowed down a lot, as blogs have a tendency to do. And trying to recover from COVID, plus adding fossil hunting and its sometimes arduous hiking as a hobby, I started riding fewer miles, and not really setting mileage goals and tracking miles any more. So even that went missing from the blog. So now, I have decided to add some fishing posts to the blog. I added a fishing category years ago when I bought a pedal kayak that much resembles a recumbent bike pedaling position, but never made many fishing posts. But now that I’m retired, I’m fishing more than ever, and having a blast at it. Fishing has been a passion my entire adult life, as well as designing and making baits. I still have lure molds I purchased in the ’70’s. I’ve done some posting about my fishing and lure making over on the Texas Fishing Forum. Maybe I’ll migrate some of that here, like I did with cycling and fossil hunting forum posts. We’ll see.

For 25 years, starting in 1981, I was a passionate bass tournament angler. I had a lot of success at the club level, only limited success above that. I quit tournament fishing in 2006. I got tired of the competition, and wanted to make my fishing less intense. And my shoulders and back were so bad, as well as the arthritis in my fingers, moving to crappie fishing seemed like something my body would tolerate much better, and that is what I did. For quite a few years, almost all my fishing was crappie fishing. But as I started working fewer hours, and finally retired this year, my back and shoulders are much better. And with the lighter equipment and gentler techniques I use these days, I’ve started bass fishing again. Many trips these days, I’ll spend some time crappie fishing as well as some time bass fishing.

And that got me updating bass lures I make, plus adding new ones. Last Friday, I got reminded of how much I’m loving the new 5″ finesse worm I’m making when I caught this bass which weighed almost six pounds.

Since the mid ’80’s, my favorite plastic worm had been a four inch ringworm in fire and ice color. As much as I loved that fire and ice color, I could never catch many fish on it with any other style worm. It took me a long time to figure out that the translucency of that worm was a large factor in that. The main body of the worm is so thin, and the ribs are also really thin, so the entire worm is very translucent. No other fire and ice lures I tried were that translucent. But my worm fishing style these days, with a shaky head jig, are more suited to a finesse worm than that old ringworm. So I knew it was time for a new worm. But fire and ice has long since fallen out of favor with fishermen, so there are absolutely no fire and ice finess worms to be found.

I finally used an Amazon gift card early this year to purchase a couple of molds, and started making my own finesse worms. The six inch Do-It finesse wom mold I bought makes a worm too thick for fire and ice to be an effective color with it. I made a few and tried them, but I also made those worms in a green pumpkin color, and that proved to be a better color for them. The other mold I bought was a five inch finesse worm called a Flirt, made by Bug Molds. That worm is really thin, and seemed to be a better candidate for fire and ice. I made the worm in both green pumpkin and fire and ice. Both caught fish, but the fire and ice REALLY caught fish. I’d found my new bass worm. Here is the worm rig I throw these days.

You can’t get a decent feel for the color by looking at that photo. Professional photos the worm manufacturers take give a better idea, but even they don’t really convey well what that worm will look like in sunlight. The worm in this photo is out of focus, but it shows how translucent my finesse worm is.

I throw that worm on a seven foot rod, a size 15 spinning reel, and 10 pound test braided line. It’s pretty much the same thing I crappie fish with, except that Mojo Bass rod is stiffer than any of my crappie rods. But like my crappie rigs, it’s a setup that easy on an old man body. The fire and ice color is laminated, purple with blue glitter on one side, and purple with red glitter on the other. My version of fire and ice isn’t laminated, it’s just purple with red and blue glitter added. With a worm this thin, I don’t think laminating is really required to get the color right.

Week before last, I bought a new truck, a brand new Ford Ranger. Now that I’m retired, a pickup seems much more of a fit for me than the Mercedes Metris cargo van I used for work. With its small tires and low ground clearance, I was always paranoid about getting stuck when I parked off road on my fishing or fossil hunting trips. I installed a hitch in the truck last Tuesday, and Friday was my first time towing the boat with it. It did great.

Friday, I spent the morning crappie fishing under a bridge. It was pretty chilly in the shade of that bridge, and when I let the boat drift out into the sun for a lunch break, I realized it was much more comfortable in the sun on that day. So I decided to spend an hour or so bass fishing. I started out throwing a crankbait. Two years ago in the fall, a crankbait did great on this lake. But Friday, I couldn’t muster a single bite on one. So I picked up the finesse worm and threw it for a bit. I caught two bass, the first one being the beauty in the photo. It was a tough day. I only caught eight keeping size crappie, and two bass. But when one of the bass looks like the one above, and three of the crappie were so big, they were plenty more than enough for a meal, and their fillets would barely fit in a pint zip lock bag, I won’t complain.

Navarro County creek – November 18th

I made a trip to a Navarro County creek Thursday morning. This is the same creek I visited a few weeks ago, but I was a little bit further downstream Thursday. It was still a Wolfe City formation area. It ended up being one of those days where I spent more time hiking and exploring than I should have. I was looking for likely outcrops in this creek, and just didn’t find any. I eventually started checking the unlikely looking ones closely, but never did find any fossils that way. I finally spent some time crawling gravel bars, and found a few things there. I’m still a relative newbie at this, but in my limited experience, I’ve had better luck finding fossils in good shape in outcrops than on gravel bars. This day was no exception; what I found on the gravel bars was in rough shape.

The best gravel bar was less than a half mile downstream from the outcrop where I found everything last time I was in this creek, but it was obvious that Thursday’s teeth didn’t come from that outcrop. All of the teeth from that outcrop were black; Thursday’s teeth were brown. I found myself wondering where the outcrop was where they came from, if it was covered with mud and would show up again next flood, or if I had just missed it in my searching. I didn’t leave myself much time for crawling gravel bars Thursday. I want to hunt this area again. Thursday’s haul was pretty sparse, and in rough shape. Click the photos to be able to zoom in and get a closer look.

Here are a couple of in situ photos. You’ll have to look very closely to see the fossil in that first photo. Hint: it’s really close to the glove.

Here’s the tooth from the second in situ photo. When I saw that in situ view, I thought I had found a beautiful tooth, half buried in gravel. It turned out the half of the tooth I was seeing was all there was. It had split in two.

This tooth from the first in situ photo is in better shape than anything else from the trip. A pretty little tooth.

This appears to be a piece of an Enchodus fang.

This Squalicorax tooth isn’t just broken, it’s also worn to the point that there aren’t any serrations left.

This smaller Squalicorax tooth is also broken, but still has serrations.

Not enough left of this long and slender tooth to tell what it is.

This one has obviously done some serious tumbling on the rocks

One root missing from this one.

I thought this was a broken part of a large tooth, but the view of the break in that second photo makes it look more like a bone.

I thought this was a bone. Here are views of both sides.

But someone over at The Fossil Forum recognized it as a piece of a mammal tooth. Looking at this end view, that’s obviously correct.

This smaller fish vert shows the effects of tumbling on the gravel. The larger one is covered with so much matrix that I almost didn’t recognize what it was.

DFW creek, – November 8th

Last Monday, I had a dentist appointment in the morning in Dallas. I left afterward and drove a few miles west to check out a new creek. This part of the creek is mapped as Eagle Ford, but the few fossils I found all appear to have come from a red zone in the outcrop that I’ve never seen in an Eagle Ford area before, only Ozan. But in this part of DFW, Austin Chalk is between Eagle Ford and Ozan, and they are miles apart. Experts in The Fossil Forum inform me that this is the Britton part of Eagle Ford.

Here are the ammonite pieces I found. Click the photos to be able to zoom in and get a closer look.

And these two bacculite pieces.

I liked this ammonite imprint in this rock.

This imprint is a heteromorph ammonite.

While this is clearly a fossil, I had no idea what it was. It turns out it is fossilized crustacean droppings, used to line a burrow.

Navarro County creek, October 26th

I live near the western edge of Henderson County in Texas. It’s a fairly flat area with few outcrops of any kind exposed, and even when they are, they aren’t very fossiliferous. The county just west of me is Navarro County, and it does actually have some formations that hold fossils. But I haven’t had much luck finding anything in Navarro County. I keep looking, since it’s so close. I did a long hike down a Navarro County creek yesterday. For most of the day, it looked like another of those trips where I just don’t find anything. But one thing I’ve learned about fossil hunting is that even after hours of unproductive searching, it only takes one small spot to make you end up bringing home some cool stuff. Yesterday, I eventually found that small spot.

The area I hunted is Wolfe City formation. I just didn’t have any luck finding anything in the gravel bars in the creek, or in the outcrops themselves. But I did stumble on an outcrop that had some fossils in the mud just below it. For those who enjoy “Find the fossil”, here are some in situ photos. That pick is small. The handle is about 55 mm long. Click the photos to be able to zoom in and get a closer look.


And here is what I brought home. Excuse the quality of my photos today. It is very dark with serious rain outside, so I did the best I could for lighting indoors.

There were some interesting bone bits. These first four all look like Enchodus jaw pieces to me, including part of a fang.



This is an interesting bone bit, but I’m not sure what it’s from. I took a photo of each side.

These two small fish verts are the same size.

And the teeth. I love these first two teeth. These are the smallest Lamniform teeth I’ve ever found with the cusplets intact. I didn’t realize it until I got it under the microscope, but this first tooth actually has double cusplets on both sides.

Most of the Squalicorax teeth I found yesterday were broken, but there were a few in better shape. I do believe this first one is the biggest Squalicorax I’ve found.


Yesterday’s Lamniform teeth weren’t very large. Here are the biggest of the bunch.


This tooth looked very unusual to me, as large as the cusplets are, compared to the main cusp.

Other teeth. This first one is the smallest tooth of the day.



East Texas Creek, October 12th

On Tuesday, I made a trip back to the East Texas creek where I had found micro teeth last month. This creek is a Kincaid Formation outcrop. I had found the one and only productive area there just before I had to leave last time, so wanted to explore it better. Rain threatened the entire time I was there Tuesday, but it didn’t really rain hard until I had gotten back home.

Unlike my last time here, I found very little soft matrix on top of the limestone this time. At first, I wondered if it was just because our dry spell lately had hardened everything, but the more I explored, the more I came to realize that most of the softer matrix had just already been chiseled off. It’s a reminder of how hard it is to find spots that aren’t over hunted here in Texas. I didn’t find many teeth at all this time, but brought home some suspicious matrix from where I did find a few teeth. I just finished going through that matrix, and sure enough, it did have a few more teeth in it. Here is what I got from the trip, including what I found in the matrix. Click the photos to be able to zoom in and get a closer look.

There were shell fragments everywhere in the matrix, but this looked very different from most. It looks like it might be from a crab.

Here are some individual tooth photos.












>

September 29th – DFW creek

I hunted for the second day in a row yesterday. This was a creek in the middle of Dallas-Fort Worth. I’d wanted to make a trip to this creek for a while, plus had some errands in the city, so made the drive for both yesterday. After the long and arduous hike the day before, this was supposed to be short and easy. I was seriously mistaken about that. The creek banks were just too steep to get into the creek. I ended up walking quite a ways, and even then, went down a bank so steep that I tied a rope and left it to get myself back up the bank. I was thinking that if rain got anywhere near me, I’d better clear out quick, or I’d never make it back up that bank.

This is an Eagle Ford creek. It was a really great looking outcrop in this creek, but I couldn’t get it to yield much. And the shower the night before had the gravel bars wet enough that they were tough hunting too. But I did bring home a few pieces. Click the photos to be able to zoom in and get a closer look. This ammonite was trying to crumble.

This little fish vert was pretty flattened.

This matrix is so hard the tooth isn’t wanting to come out. Maybe I’ll just leave it there.

This little piece attached to the matrix looks a lot different than all the other shell fragments I saw. Part of a crab, maybe?

This gastropod looked like it had tumbled on the rocks a lot.

And then there was this. In case I didn’t recognize this side of it at all,

I was really baffled by the pattern on this side of it.

Here’s an end view of it. The experts over at The Fossil Forum identified it as a lobster. I hadn’t seen anything like it before.

September 28th – Central Texas creek

I have enjoyed the dry spell we’ve been having lately in Texas. It’s given me a chance to check out some new fossil sites while the water is low. I’ve been getting out hunting one day each week. But rain is coming to Texas. The forecast for the next three days calls for rain every day. I had two new creeks in opposite directions that I really wanted to check out while the water is low. What to do. I made the decision any retired person should make: I hunted each creek on consecutive days this week.

I drove to creek one Tuesday. It’s in central Texas. The outcrop is Wolfe City formation. As I hiked my way up to the main outcrop, I walked some great looking gravel bars, so I stopped and searched them on knee pads. The only thing I found were these three Hamulus worm tubes. Click the photos to be able to zoom in and get a closer look.

With not much luck on the gravel bars, I stopped at the best looking outcrop, and started searching it up and down. The fossils were there, but as so often happens, only in a very small layer of the matrix. It’s a great looking outcrop, with several flat steps, where the matrix gets harder. This bottom one was the only one that had fossils. At low water was the right time to hunt this creek. If the water level had been a couple of feet higher, I wouldn’t have been able to search the right layer. Here’s what that lower level looked like.

When I spotted this bone sticking out of the matrix, I wondered how big it was.

I very carefully excavated around it, and was disappointed when it turned out to only be a small bone.

There were teeth sticking out of the matrix as well.

And then there was this bone. It’s from the jaw of an Enchodus. Enchodus is an extinct fish that had two very large fangs. You can see the base of one of those fangs on this bone, but the tooth is broken off.

Here are the teeth I found. Most teeth from this site are in really rough shape, broken and with no roots.

This little Serratolamna shark tooth was my favorite of the day.

Individual photos of some of the other teeth.

Ellis County creek, September 14th

Tuesday morning, I made a fossil hunting trip back to the Ellis County creek where I’ve found so many teeth. I had been making a short hike across the pastures of two land owners to get to this creek, but the last time I asked permission, one of the land owners refused me, saying he had made a deal to give exclusive rights to another fossil hunting family. I can still get to the creek, but now it’s a very long hike for me. So, I waited until the hottest part of summer was gone to try that long hike.

When I reached the small section of the creek where I’d been finding most of the teeth, this is what I saw. Click the photos to be able to zoom in and get a closer look.

There was about a 35 foot long stretch where the matrix had been dug into rubble like this. I’ve always made it a practice to not chisel out more matrix than what I can thoroughly go through right then, or take home in my backpack. Obviously, that’s not the technique of the fossil hunters I share the creek with. I didn’t see how this much matrix could have been looked at thoroughly even in a couple of days, so I just started the day by looking at what they had dug up, and wondering if they left anything. I had my answer pretty quickly, when I spotted this.

Those two teeth were sizeable enough that I knew that if they hadn’t been spotted by the previous hunters, there would be plenty to be found in the rubble, and whatever I left would all be washed away in the next major rain, so I spent much of my time in the creek going through the rubble. But this was the lowest I’d ever seen the water level in the creek. There was no flow at all. So, I left myself a couple of hours to explore the gravel bars, and check further down the creek than I’d been before. It wasn’t the kind of easy pickings I’d had in the creek in previous trips, but I still found plenty to keep me entertained. It took me a couple of days to get through all the matrix I brought home, and as always with this creek, I was amazed at the number of small Ptychodus teeth I found in matrix that I brought home for other reasons. Here are the teeth I brought home. Most were retrieved from matrix.

The matrix from this creek is usually very hard. Some of it has to be soaked in vinegar to manage to pick anything out of it. There are micro teeth to be found among the other teeth, but they are almost always broken, and very hard to remove from this matrix at all. I brought this matrix home for the tooth you can see on the right, but notice the two micro teeth on the left.

Here are some individual photos of some of the teeth. This first one looks like a mosasaur tooth to me.

Here are some of the nicer Ptychodus teeth. Most Ptychodus teeth I find in this creek are pretty small, but this first one is pretty nice sized.






Other teeth.















And finally, these bone bits. It’s funny how often I find bits in this same general, peculiar shape. I always think they’re teeth, but on closer exam, they look like bone bits, and they don’t usually come out of this hard matrix in one piece, since they aren’t as hard as shark teeth. Someone in The Fossil Forum thought they might be Enchodus jaw fragments.